Legal Opinion

Vanadium Corporation of America v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 18, 1957No. 18092PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

This is a workmen’s compensation case primarily relating to whether the evidence properly showed that a congenital back defect was permanently aggravated or increased due to an accident admittedly arising out of and in the course of claimant’s employment.

We refer to the parties as they appeared below where plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and defendants in error were defendants, or, where necessary, to plaintiff in error Vanadium Corporation of America as the employer; plaintiff in error the State Compensation Insurance Fund as the Fund; defendant in error Dudley J. Sargent as claimant;:…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Passini v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Olson-Hall v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Industrial Commission v. DiveleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Bellendir v. KezerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Industrial Commission v. HavensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Allee v. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API