Carroll v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. Claim disallowed. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Francis E. Bouck, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
The plaintiffs in error, as widow and minor children of *474Joseph Carroll, filed a claim for compensation with the Industrial Commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Joseph Carroll died while an employe and working as such. The plaintiffs in error filed their claim as his dependents. After a hearing, the Commission found, as a conclusion based upon the' facts, that the death of Joseph Carroll “was not the proximate result of an accident sustained” by him.
The claimants filed an action in the District Court to set aside the order denying compensation. That court affirmed the order of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by82 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Nicholson v. Roundup Coal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.