Legal Opinion
T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch v. Bourn
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 7, 1970No. 24275PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
This involves a writ of error addressed to a district court judgment which reversed a denial of a compensation award by the Industrial Commission. Our disposition of this matter results from a different interpretation of the statutory definitions' of “accident” and “injury” as applied to heart attack cases than that employed by the commission and the court.
The plaintiffs in error are the T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch (the employer), the employer’s insurer and the commission. The defendants in error are the claimants, being the widow and minor child of Byron Bourn.
Mr. Bourn, age 41 at his…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Crow v. Missouri Implement Tractor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Industrial Commission v. HavensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Vanadium Corporation of America v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Industrial Commission v. MilkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- CITY & CTY. OF DENVER v. Indus. CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Public Service Co. of Colo. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch, Inc. v. BournSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.