Legal Opinion

City of Tualatin v. City of Durham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

(Pro Tempore).

The transcript and exhibits indicate that this case is part of a continuing controversy involving the cities of Tualatin and Durham and some residents of the surrounding area in Washington County, over expansion of city limits. The cities are small. (The current Oregon Blue Book lists Tualatin’s population as 462 and Durham’s as 240.) Tualatin was incorporated in 1913. In recent years it annexed territory, some of which it zoned industrial to the vexation of some adjacent non-city residential landowners. The latter joined in 1966 to incorporate the new city of Durham, primarily…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Landis v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hansell v. DouglassOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Peterkort & Co. v. East Washington County Zoning DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mead Corp. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Marion County Fire District 1 v. Marion-Polk County Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Eustace v. SpeckhartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Mead Corp. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Mead Corp. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API