Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mead Corp. v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1977No. SC 2350,2392Published

1Dissent

This case has had a long and tortuous journey, the facts of which are fully set out in the trial judge's decree, which follows:

"JUDGMENT AND FINAL DECREE

I

Introduction

"This action was commenced by The Mead Corporation (hereinafter `plaintiff' or `Mead') on February 17, 1975, against The City of Birmingham, a municipal corporation (hereinafter `defendant' or `Birmingham') and other defendants in order to contest the legality of a proposed annexation by defendant of certain territory lying in the Oxmoor Valley section of southwestern Jefferson County (hereinafter the annexation by Birmingham is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API