Legal Opinion

Mead Corp. v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1977No. SC 2350,2392Published

1Opinion of the Court

350 So.2d 419 (1977)

The MEAD CORPORATION, a corporation, et al.

v.

The CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, a Municipal Corporation, et al.

SC 2350,2392.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 30, 1977.

Norman K. Brown, Bessemer, for appellant, the Mead Corp.

J. Fred Powell and William F. Murray, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant United States Steel Corp.

James L. North, Frank M. Young, III, and Philip W. Norwood, Birmingham, for appellee.

Kenneth Perrine, Birmingham, for Mason Corporation, et al., amicus curiae.

ALMON, Justice.

Appellants initiated this suit challenging the validity of the City of Birmingham's annexation of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API