Legal Opinion

Witham v. McNutt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The plaintiff is a taxpayer and property owner within the territory commonly known as the “South Willamette Street Area”. The defendants are the city of Eugene, its mayor and councilmen. The complaint alleges that on 2 November 1948 a purported election was held in Lane County, Oregon, pursuant to Chapter 335, Oregon Laws 1947, at which the proposed annexation of the South Willamette Street Area to the city of Eugene was submitted to the voters. The complaint alleges:

“That the defendants directed one O. V. Gilmore to post notices of such purported election prior to such election at four…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Mullen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Marsden v. HarlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Bennett Trust Co. v. SengstackenOregon Supreme Court · 1911

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cook v. CorbettOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hansell v. DouglassOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Nueces County Water Control & Improvement District No. 4 v. State Ex Rel. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API