Legal Opinion

Hansell v. Douglass

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This was a declaratory judgment proceeding by which plaintiffs, and the intervenor, challenged a school election. The challenged election favored the consolidation of three school districts in Wasco county. The trial court found that the election was valid. Plaintiffs and intervenor appeal.

The major premise of plaintiffs’ challenge is found in this statement taken from their brief:

* * * “There can be no doubt that a school election is an exercise of the initiative process and subject to the statutes enacted pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. la of the Oregon Constitution.”

Plaintiffs cite no authority…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Burton v. GibbonsOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Tatum v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. City of Tualatin v. City of DurhamOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Deboard v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API