Ramsey v. Furlott
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The answer set up as a defense that there was no consideration for the debt and that the plaintiffs had waived the lien of the mortgage by selling certain real estate under a deed of trust. The answer alleged that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $3,500, evidenced by a note secured by a deed of trust on real estate; that subsequently another note and this chattel mortgage were given as security for this same indebtedness; that there was but one debt and this note and chattel mortgage were given only as additional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- First National Bank of San Francisco v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hellier v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bank of California v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Pace v. ThreewitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946