Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Furlott

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1936No. Civ. 1780PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The answer set up as a defense that there was no consideration for the debt and that the plaintiffs had waived the lien of the mortgage by selling certain real estate under a deed of trust. The answer alleged that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $3,500, evidenced by a note secured by a deed of trust on real estate; that subsequently another note and this chattel mortgage were given as security for this same indebtedness; that there was but one debt and this note and chattel mortgage were given only as additional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. First National Bank of San Francisco v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Hellier v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Bank of California v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Pace v. ThreewitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API