First National Bank of San Francisco v. Golden
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
In this case a rehearing was granted, but after further consideration, with some minor changes and with the citation of additional authorities, we adhere to our original position.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Prior to the twenty-sixth day of December, 1907, F. H. Rowe was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $3,825. On that date Rowe gave the plaintiff his check on the Canadian Bank of Commerce for the sum of $1,000, and the time for payment of the balance was extended to January 25, 1905. When this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mills v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF WASHINGTON v. Triplett & NealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Hostetter v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Coffey v. Day & Night Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ramsey v. FurlottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Day & Night Nat. Bank of Pikeville v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928