Legal Opinion

Bank of California v. McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1937No. Civ. 5719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

A rehearing was granted in this cause by reason of the fact that all of the occurrences involved in this action took place prior to the act of the legislature (Stats. 1935, p. 2225), amending section 2957 of the Civil Code relative to the rerecording of chattel mortgages, and, therefore, the section as amended should not have been considered or followed in the decision of this cause.

On the original hearing the opinion prepared for this court by Judge Maxey (sitting as a justice pro tempore), is so complete as to the facts involved and some of the questions considered, that we here readopt the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. White v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hall v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bibend v. Liverpool & London Fire & Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Security First National Bank v. SartoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. In Re George & John HurtDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  4. Garter v. Metzdorf AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Merced Production Credit Assn. v. BayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API