Huebotter v. Follett
California Supreme Court
1DissentEdmonds, J.
I cannot agree with the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice Schauer that where there are two issues of fact, it is prejudicial error justifying a reversal for the trial judge to correctly instruct the juryi in regard to the one upon which the evidence is uncontradicted, if the verdict is consistent with and supported by all of the evidence in the case. An issue upon which there is no contradictory evidence and concerning which only one reasonable inference can be drawn should be ruled upon by the court as a question of law (Bibb v. Allen, 149 U.S. 481, 493 [13 S.Ct. 950, 37 L.Ed. 819]; *772Upton v.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Henderson v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Patter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.