Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1983No. 8213SC1140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error relates to his sentencing hearing. He argues that the trial court erred when it found that the offense of felonious uttering was committed for pecuniary gain and, thereby, improperly found that the factors in aggravation outweighed the factors in mitigation of defendant’s sentence. We agree.

The issue raised by defendant’s argument is whether pecuniary gain is inherent in the offense of felonious uttering. That offense comprises three essential elements: (1) the offer of a forged check or other instrument to another; (2) with knowledge that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. AbdullahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API