Legal Opinion

State v. Aldridge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1984No. 838SC94PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

I

The State introduced over defendant’s objection, photostatic copies of the check and receipt from the buyer of the silver. Defendant contends that this violated the “best evidence rule,” which requires production of originals. Had the contents of the check been at issue, we would agree. However, defendant admits signing the receipt and accepting the check made out to him. The only question before the jury was his purpose in so doing, not the issuance or terms of the documents. It is well settled that the best evidence rule applies only where the contents or terms of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. FelmetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. PenlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API