Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Chandler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1996No. 343A93Published

1DissentJustice Orr

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion on two grounds. First, the trial court erred in submitting the (e)(6) aggravating circumstance — that the capital felony was committed for pecuniary gain, N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(e)(6) (Supp. 1995) — and second, the death sentence is disproportionate.

In 1977, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a new capital punishment statute, N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000, modeled in large part on the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code § 210.6. See State v. Johnson, 298 N.C. 47, 56-63, 257 S.E.2d 597, 606-10 (1979) (reviewing the history leading to the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API