Legal Opinion

State v. Morris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1982No. 8218SC180PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

The defendant presents four arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in determining that the statement given by him was voluntary and admissible; (2) that the trial court should have allowed his motion to dismiss, since there was no evidence of an intent by defendant to rob the Majik Market; (3) that the trial court erred by referring to defendant’s statement as a “confession;” and (4) that the trial court erred by considering “pecuniary gain” and “possession of a deadly weapon” as aggravating circumstances at his robbery with a firearm sentencing hearing. For the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Juneby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. People v. RobersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. AbdullahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. SetzerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API