State v. Abdullah
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
Defendant first contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of the prosecutor’s actions in allegedly coercing a witness, Clarence Buchanan, to identify the defendant as the man who sold him Officer Cannon’s service revolver.
The evidence at trial tended to show that defendant, after killing Officer Cannon and taking the officer’s revolver, together with Owens and Randolph, fled the scene in the car driven by Washington. A short distance from the store, defendant threw Officer Cannon’s revolver from the car window. The following day, 24 November 1981, Martin apparently…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.