Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barnett v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1998No. 97-2792PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

141 F.3d 699

Richard BARNETT, personally and as class representative, and

Mary Bonilla, personally and as class

representative, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees,

and

Carole Bialczak, et al., Intervening Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 97-2792, 97-2793.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Feb. 18, 1998.

Decided April 1, 1998.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied May 6, 1998.*

Judson H. Miner (argued), Jeffrey I. Cummings, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, R. Eugene Pincham, P. Scott Neville, Jr., Howse, Howse, Neville & Gray, Jonathan A.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Nipper v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Mars Ketchum v. Jane M. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Wisconsin v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shirt v. HazeltineDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
  2. Black Political Task Force v. GalvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. Reyes v. City of Farmers Branch, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Perez v. Pasadena Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API