Wisconsin v. City of New York
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
In conducting the 1990 United States Census, the Secretary of Commerce decided not to use a particular statistical adjustment that had been designed to correct an undercount in the initial enumeration. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the Secretary’s decision was subject to heightened scrutiny because of its effect on the right of individual respondents to have their vote counted equally. We hold that the Secretary’s decision was not subject to heightened scrutiny, and that it conformed to applicable constitutional and statutory provisions.
The Constitution requires an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Utah v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Trump v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Crista Ramos v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.