Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Independent School District
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:
The panel hereby withdraws its previous opinion and substitutes the following.
Plaintiffs-Appellants claim that the at-large, by-place, majority-vote elections for positions on the AHISD board of trustees dilute their votes as Hispanics in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1966. See 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (1994) (as amended). The district court found that the Plaintiffs failed to make out a vote dilution claim because they could not prove, under the first Gingles threshold factor, that Hispanics are a “sufficiently large and geographically compact…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Session v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
- Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Session v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004