Legal Opinion

Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Independent School District

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1999No. 98-50227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

The panel hereby withdraws its previous opinion and substitutes the following.

Plaintiffs-Appellants claim that the at-large, by-place, majority-vote elections for positions on the AHISD board of trustees dilute their votes as Hispanics in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1966. See 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (1994) (as amended). The district court found that the Plaintiffs failed to make out a vote dilution claim because they could not prove, under the first Gingles threshold factor, that Hispanics are a “sufficiently large and geographically compact…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Session v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
  2. Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Session v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API