Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. Gingles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 30, 1986No. 83-1968PublishedCited by 1,199 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Brennan

This case requires that we construe for the first time § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended June 29, 1982. 42 U. S. C. § 1973. The specific question to be decided is whether the three-judge District Court, convened in the Eastern District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2284(a) and 42 U. S. C. § 1973c, correctly held that the use in a legislative redistricting plan of multimember districts in five North Carolina legislative districts violated §2 by impairing the opportunity of black voters “to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,199 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

1,194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API