Legal Opinion
Stasulat v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1937No. S. F. No. 15758PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson , J.
This case was taken over after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First District, Division One. The facts are taken from the opinion by Mr. Justice Gray sitting pro tempore.
“The surviving mother, brother and two sisters of a lineman employed by the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company sued the Pacific Gas and Electric Company to recover damages for his alleged wrongful death. They claimed that his death resulted from injuries which he received in a fall from a telephone pole on which he was working, and that the fall was due to his receiving an electric shock, caused by appellant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.