Legal Opinion

Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1919No. Civ. No. 2852PublishedCited by 42 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff upon which judgment was entered and from which defendant has appealed upon the judgment-roll accompanied by a bill of exceptions.

The facts out of which the accident grew and concerning which there is little controversy in the evidence are as follows: At the time when plaintiff sustained the injury, defendant was engaged in constructing and operating a telephone system in the city of San Diego. For its use as a storeroom for supplies and material…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Horan v. Inhabitants of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Stasulat v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API