Legal Opinion

Roe v. Albertson's, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2005No. 29596PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case arises from the sexual relationship between Tim Repp (Repp), an Albert-son’s supervisor, and Jane Doe (Doe), a minor and also an Albertson’s employee. Doe and her parents sued Albertson’s alleging various tort claims for failing to protect Doe from Repp’s sexual advances. On motion for summary judgment the district court found in Albertson’s favor, holding Doe’s and her parents’ claims barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Idaho Worker’s Compensation Act. Doe and her parents (collectively referred to as Appellants) appealed. We reverse and remand the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. O'NEIL v. SchuckardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patricia Marek v. Hecla, LimitedIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bollinger v. FALL RIVER RURAL ELEC. CO-OP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bollinger v. Fall River Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Luce v. MarbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Corgatelli v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API