Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & Tucker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1999No. 24627PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This legal malpractice case against Respondent, Rosholt, Robertson & Tucker (RR & T), arose from RR & T’s representation of Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. (Sun Valley) in a contract dispute. In the underlying contract action, a jury returned a verdict against Sun Valley and in favor of the plaintiff, Mainline Ranches (Mainline), for in excess of $500,000 based upon Sun Valley’s allegedly wrongful rejection of a large quantity of potatoes. Subsequently, SunValley sued RR & T alleging three causes of action, including legal malpractice. RR & T responded with a counterclaim…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Andersen v. Professional Escrow Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Biomet Inc. v. Finnegan Henderson LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Martha A. Arregui v. Rosalinda Gallegos-MainIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API