Legal Opinion

Gifford v. Nottingham

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1948No. 7388PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYATT, Justice.

Appellant Nottingham as general contractor was engaged in the construction of certain sewers in and for the City of Pocatello. Grayson and Horner, under sub-contract with Nottingham, were digging pipe trenches for the sewers. Earl Frank Gifford, son of the respondents, was killed on March 12, 1946, while engaged in the trench digging, as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Grayson and Horner, occasioned by the negligence of Nottingham’s employees who were performing work at the time in such sewer construction.

Respondents brought this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. Benjamin F. Bennett Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Lebak v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Honaker v. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. House v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API