Legal Opinion

Luce v. Marble

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2005No. 30691PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This matter involves a dispute over the ownership of a parcel of land in Lenore, Idaho. Appellant, Esther Luce (Luce) brought an action for quiet title, boundary by acquiescence, adverse possession, easement by prescription, and trespassing and damage to real property. Respondent, William E. Marble (Marble) counterclaimed for quiet title. This ease comes to this Court on appeal from the judgment quieting title in Marble and granting Luce an easement and the order awarding costs and attorney’s fees to Marble. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Esther Luce (Luce) and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gardner v. FliegelIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Beckstead v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Teton Peaks Investment Co. v. OhmeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fenn v. NoahIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API