Ponemon v. Inc. Village of East Hills
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Parley, J.
Three motions are before the court: (1) A motion by the defendant municipality and public officers for summary judgment or to dismiss under rule 106 the several causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint; (2) a motion by the individual and private corporate defendants for identical relief; (3) a motion by the plaintiffs for an injunction pendente lite. The first two motions will be first jointly considered, although the third motion was made earlier.
The amended complaint attacks the validity of two amendments to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Village of Bast Hills adopted on July…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake SuccessNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Hattem v. SilverNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Isen Contracting Corp. v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake SuccessNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Elbert v. Village of North HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Place v. HackNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Challette, Inc. v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Supreme Court · 1964