Hattem v. Silver
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. G-ttlotta, J.
On this application to review the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long-Beach, respondents move to dismiss the petition on the ground that no facts are alleged showing that petitioners are aggrieved parties. (See General City Law, § 82.)
The law is well settled that to he a “ person aggrieved ” one must be specially, personally and adversely affected as distinguished from one who is merely in the general class of a taxpayer whose only interest is to have strict enforcement of zoning regulations for the welfare of the entire community. There must be special injury or…
2Cited by10 opinions
- East Diamond Head Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- Cox v. PoerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1969
- Glen v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Buckelew v. Town of ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- D'ALMEIDA v. Sheldon Realty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.