Legal Opinion

Hattem v. Silver

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. G-ttlotta, J.

On this application to review the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long-Beach, respondents move to dismiss the petition on the ground that no facts are alleged showing that petitioners are aggrieved parties. (See General City Law, § 82.)

The law is well settled that to he a “ person aggrieved ” one must be specially, personally and adversely affected as distinguished from one who is merely in the general class of a taxpayer whose only interest is to have strict enforcement of zoning regulations for the welfare of the entire community. There must be special injury or…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. East Diamond Head Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cox v. PoerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  3. Glen v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Buckelew v. Town of ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. D'ALMEIDA v. Sheldon Realty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API