Legal Opinion

Challette, Inc. v. Town of Brookhaven

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

Brookhaven Town moves pursuant to 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 2, 10) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules to dismiss this action for the reason that the court does not have jurisdiction in that there is an absence here of persons who should be parties. Plaintiff Challette, Inc., brought the action for judgment declaring the invalidity of a certain amendment to the town’s Building Zone Ordinance. The amendment itself is one which “upzoned” all land, except for one parcel, in Union Free School District No. 1 in the township, which school district takes in some approximately 2,700 acres. Of this,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Movers & Warehousemen's Ass'n of Greater New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Wood v. City of SalamancaNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis Construction Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. 208 East 30th Street Corp. v. Town of North SalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Avelli v. Town of BabylonNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Town of North Hempstead v. Incorporated Village of WestburyNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API