Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake Success
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
Plaintiffs, owners of residences within the defendant village, seek an injunction and a declaration that certain amendments of the Village Zoning Ordinance are invalid because (1) not adopted in accordance with statutory procedures, (2) they constitute “spot zoning,” (3) they constitute zoning by contract. After introduction of part of the evidence, defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that (1) this is a taxpayer’s action and section 51 of the General Municipal Law has not been complied with, (2) plaintiffs have no standing to bring this action, (3) the owners of the property directly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Leventhal v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- 208 East 30th Street Corp. v. Town of North SalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- 2525 East Avenue, Inc. v. Town of BrightonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.