Legal Opinion

Elbert v. Village of North Hills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

By a prior motion the appellants moved pursuant to rules 102,103 and 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for the following alternative relief: (1) Dismissal of the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action; (2) for an order directing the plaintiff to serve an amended pleading upon the ground that there was a misjoinder of the parties plaintiff; ,(3) for an order striking from the complaint as improper, irrelevant and unnecessary paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the prayer for relief. The court granted the motion to dismiss the complaint and from the order entered thereon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Self-Insurer's Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Brenner v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Wardrop Co. v. Fairfield Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Elbert v. Village of North HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ponemon v. Inc. Village of East HillsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Reinman v. JaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Zwarycz v. Marnia Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Zwarycz v. Marnia Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API