Isen Contracting Corp. v. Town of Oyster Bay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
While the evidence presented a question of fact as to whether the amendment constituted spot zoning, nevertheless plaintiff offered no evidence warranting a finding that by the enactment of the amendment it had suffered detriment or that there was waste of the funds of the town. (Bowery Sav. Bank v. Plymouth Colony Corp., 254 App. Div. 870.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bowery Savings Bank v. Plymouth Colony Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Greenberg v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Thomas v. Town of BedfordNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake SuccessNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake SuccessNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.