Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 13930PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This action was brought by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff in error, and the parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The facts, briefly stated, were substantially as follows.

'The plaintiff was a disabled soldier and was ordered by medical authority to the hospital at Houston, Tex., for treatment, and for this purpose the United States furnished him an order or requisition for transportation by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. GelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Willet v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Deardorf v. RosenbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Mayo Hotel Co. v. DancigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Holmes v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API