Legal Opinion
Deardorf v. Rosenbusch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 31, 1949No. 33571PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Karl W. Reynolds, holder of the record title to an 1/160 mineral interest in the northeast quarter of section 9, township 14 north, range 4 west, Oklahoma county, instituted action against Louise A. Rosenbusch, his remote grantor, to quiet title thereto. Upon motion of defendant Louise A. Rosenbusch, H. L. Burkhart, her immediate grantee, and B. C. Deardorf, husband of said grantee, were made parties. By cross-petition Rosenbusch sought judgment against Deardorf and Burkhart for the reasonable value of said mineral interest, alleging that the conveyance thereof was obtained by fraud. Upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- City of Chickasha v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. LivelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Twing v. SchottWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Croslin v. Enerlex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.