Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Gelvin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri; Arba S. Van Valkenburgh, Judge. Action by David A. Gelvin against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ELEIOTT, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error, David A. Gelvin (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff), against the plaintiff in error, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), upon a petition containing two causes of action, set forth in counts numbered 1 and 2 of the petition.
Count 1 of the petition contained proper averments as to the incorporation of the defendant railway, its ownership and operation of a railroad line in and through the county of Holt, state of Missouri, adjoining lands therein referred to,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- S. S. Pass Ry. Co. v. TrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- W. A. Hover & Co. v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- The GlendolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.