Widener v. Hartnett

THE COURT.

This action was brought to set aside a conveyance and assignment of real and personal property made by defendant Timothy Hartnett to his wife, defendant Emma Hartnett, for the alleged purpose of defrauding his creditors. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant Timothy Hartnett appealed. Plaintiff now moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment. No substantial question is presented by the appeal.

Appellant’s first contention is that plaintiff had no right to maintain this action because it was predicated upon a judgment which had not become final when the com-' plaint herein was…