Liuzza v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
An appeal by defendant Aubrey Bell as administrator of the estate of Emilie Brinkerhoff, deceased, from a judgment wherein it was decreed that a deed from Mrs. Brinkerhoff to her daughter Dorothy A. Bell is null and void as against plaintiffs; that the property described therein is a part and parcel of decedent’s estate for the purpose of satisfying plaintiffs’ claim in the sum of $5,000, and is subject to a lien for the payment of such claim, together with interest and costs of suit, and that the property, or such portion thereof as is necessary, be sold to satisfy the claim, the estate…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Chambers v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Willoughby v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kinney v. VallentyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.