Legal Opinion

Burgermeister Brewing Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1961No. Civ. 10217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is a petition for prohibition or other writ to restrain respondent court from proceeding to try issues claimed by petitioner (to whom we shall refer as Burgermeister) to have been finally determined in former proceedings before the same court.

Originally Burgermeister instituted an action in the respondent court for sums alleged to be due on an open-book account by defendant Clyde A. Bowman, doing business as Bowman’s Beverage Company. Bowman answered admitting the indebtedness, but cross-complained setting forth four causes of action, two sounding in contract, the other two causes based…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API