Jenner v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bishop, Wheeler & Hoefler, and William Rix, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment. Defendant Daniel T. Murphy made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is by him from a part of the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The action was brought by plaintiff, the divorced wife of Bertram Samuel J. F. Murphy, hereinafter designated as Samuel J. Murphy, to obtain a decree that two certain deeds, dated respectively May 27, 1886, and May 26, 1897, made by defendant Samuel J. Murphy to defendant Daniel T. Murphy, are fraudulent and void as to plaintiff, and that a certain judgment for the sum of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- First National Bank v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Estate of CrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Barnard v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sewell v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Rossen v. VillanuevaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- White v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.