McClain v. Laurel Street Art Club, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BERTELSMAN, Chief Judge.
This is' an action under the Worker Adjustment Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. (“WARN”).
After pretrial proceedings, it was determined that the only issue of fact was whether the defendant’s two facilities constituted a “single site of employment” as defined in the WARN Act. The parties waived a jury on this issue, and it was tried to the court on July 26,1995.
*497Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court sets forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows:
Findings of Fact
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpenters District Council of New Orleans & Vicinity v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc., Etc., Stephen J. Plescia, Etc. v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- International Union, United Mine Workers, Hattie Mae Hilliard v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Marques v. Telles Ranch, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- United Mine Workers v. Florence Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alberts v. Nash Finch Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Johnson v. TeleSpectrum Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Wiltz v. M/G Transport Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996