Legal Opinion
United Mine Workers v. Florence Mining Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 11, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-1058PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Presently before this Court are the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants, Florence Mining Company and Quent, Inc. (together “defendant Mining Companies”) and defendants, Atlantic City Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Delmarva Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power & Light Company, Philadelphia Electric Company, Potomac Electric Power Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, and UGI Corporation (together “defendant Utility Companies”). For the reasons stated in this Opinion,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, General Truck Drivers, Office, Food & Warehouse Local 952 v. American Delivery Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Guippone v. Bh S & B Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- International Brotherhood v. American DeliveryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local Number 72 v. Giant Markets, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.