Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Nash Finch Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 15, 2007No. 05-CV-0887 (PJS/JJG)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs formerly worked at three grocery stores owned by defendant Nash Finch Company (“Nash Finch”). Plaintiffs bring this putative class action under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109, alleging that Nash Finch failed to give them 60 days’ notice prior to closing the stores. Two motions are pending before the Court: Plaintiffs have moved for class certification, and Nash Finch has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are granted in part and denied in part.

I.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Blades v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Coleman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. In re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  5. Esther S. Taylor v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beckler v. Rent Recovery Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  2. Duffek v. iMedia Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  3. Feldman v. Star Tribune Media Company LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  4. In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  5. Johnson v. North Memorial Health CareDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API