Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Parsons v. Fleming

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1994No. 93-550PublishedCited by 403 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the court of appeals erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying her requested mandamus relief. Appellant additionally contends that the court of appeals erred in overruling her summary judgment motion.

Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that: (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Myers v. GarsonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by403 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Zemcik v. LaPine Truck Sales & Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994

398 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API