Legal Opinion

Zemcik v. LaPine Truck Sales & Equipment Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1998No. 72035PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Porter, Judge.

Defendant-appellant LaPine Truck Sales & Equipment Company (“LaPine”) appeals from a summary judgment, jury verdict and treble damage judgment of $30,000 plus attorney fees and costs in favor of plaintiff-appellee Stephen Zemcik, d.b.a. Owosso Refuse (“Zemcik”), arising out of Zemcik’s claim that defendant sold him a 1984 trash packer truck with a false odometer reading in violation of R.C. 4549.45.- We find that the trial court erred in not entering summary judgment in favor of defendant on the grounds that the two-year statute of limitations (R.C. 4549.49[B]) barred Zemcik’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Regis Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Courie v. AlcoaOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Estate of Finley v. Cleveland MetroparksOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API