Legal Opinion

Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1993No. 92-636PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The certified question presented by the appellate court is whether Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Mach. Co. (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 60, 30 OBR 165, 507 N.E.2d 331, adopted the traditional test or the expanded test to determine whether a successor corporation is a mere continuation of a predecessor corporation. We need not reach this issue, however, as we find the asset purchase agreement between the Old Loopco and New Loopco presents a genuine issue of material fact.

Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that: (1) No…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API