State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Tompkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Zimmerman asserts that the court of appeals erred in granting Tompkins’s motion for summary judgment and denying the requested writ of mandamus. Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated, (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Jackson v. Alert Fire & Safety Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by432 opinions
- Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Tran v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Denton v. BedinghausOhio Supreme Court · 2003
427 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.