Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Porter, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants Kenneth Koos, Brenda Koos, Michael Baglia and Carol Baglia appeal from summary judgment entered against them in their shareholder derivative suit (Civ.R. 23.1) against the defendants-appellees Cellwave, Inc. (n.k.a. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.) and ten other shareholders of Cellwave, a closely held Ohio corporation. Plaintiffs’ sole assignment of error asserts that the lower court erred in granting summary judgment because there were genuine issues of material fact precluding judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we find no merit…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by278 opinions
- Karcich v. StuartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Zurz v. 770 West Broad Aga, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- White v. WestfallOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Broadnax v. Greene Credit ServiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Byrd v. Arbors E. & Subacute Rehab. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.