Legal Opinion

State v. Connally

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2005No. CC 000634971; CA A116517; SC S50999PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether the Portland City Code authorized police officers to inventory the contents of a closed "fanny pack” that defendant left in an impounded car. We hold that that it did and accordingly affirm the Court of Appeals decision and the trial court’s judgment.

Portland Police Officer Larson was sitting in his car outside Huskey’s house. Larson knew that Huskey had sold methamphetamine and that there was an outstanding warrant for Huskey’s arrest. Larson saw defendant and another person drive up to Huskey’s house, park, and go inside. Later, defendant, Huskey,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. FriesOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. BonillaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API