State v. Fries
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The issue in this case is whether defendant possessed marijuana when he helped a friend move marijuana plants from one place to another. Defendant has argued that, because he was moving the plants at his friend’s direction, he did not possess them. The trial court held otherwise and entered a judgment of conviction for possessing marijuana. A divided en banc Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Fries, 212 Or App 220, 158 P3d 10 (2007). We allowed defendant’s petition for review to consider the issue that divided the Court of Appeals and now affirm the Court of Appeals decision and the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. OareOregon Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Kohring v. BallardOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 2009
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.